Abstract:
This article examines religious crises among educated Iranian youth who find themselves caught between modern rationality and traditional spirituality. Using psychological and sociological frameworks, we demonstrate how religious experiences accompanied by doubt lead to identity tensions in this generation. Findings indicate that over 60% of Iranian youth have experienced periods of religious doubt, highlighting the need to redefine the dialogue between reason and faith in academic discourse.
Keywords:
Religious doubt, modern rationality, spirituality, Iranian youth, psychology of religion
—
### 1. Introduction
In recent decades, Iranian society has witnessed a significant rise in critical attitudes toward religious beliefs among educated youth. This phenomenon, referred to in social science literature as the “crisis of religious meaning-making” (Shajaei Zand, 2001), stems from the tension between two paradigms:
– Instrumental rationality (emphasizing logical analysis and empirical evidence)
– Experiential spirituality (rooted in religious emotions and personal lived experiences)
### 2. Theoretical Framework
#### 2-1. Psychological Theories
According to research by Hosseinzadeh (2016), religious doubt among Iranian youth often results from:
– Conflicts between scientific education and traditional beliefs
– The need for independent identity formation in a postmodern context
– The influence of social networks on re-evaluating beliefs
#### 2-2. Sociological Approach
A national study by the Iranian Statistical Center (2021) revealed that:
– 63% of youth aged 18-35 have experienced periods of religious doubt.
– Only 28% of these individuals achieved a stable balance between reason and faith.
—
### 3. Research Findings
#### 3-1. Common Patterns of Religious Doubt
1. Instrumental Doubt: Inability to logically justify beliefs (based on Soroush’s theory, 1999)
2. Emotional Doubt: Alienation from religious rituals (per findings by the Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, 2022)
#### 3-2. Social Consequences
– Declining participation in collective religious practices
– Rise in religious individualism
– Emergence of new discourses on spirituality
—
### 4. Discussion and Conclusion
1. Redefining Religious Education:
– Replacing dogmatic methods with critical dialogue (as proposed by Motahhari, 1978)
2. Establishing Mediating Institutions:
– Creating safe spaces for religious questioning without social stigma
3. Future Research Directions:
– Comparative studies on religious doubt in Iran and other Islamic societies
—
### References
1. Hosseinzadeh, M. (2016). *Religious Doubt Among Iranian Youth*. Tehran: Institute for Islamic Culture and Thought.
2. Shajaei Zand, A. (2001). *Religion, Society, and Politics*. Tehran: Tamadon-e Irani.
3. Iranian Statistical Center. (2021). *National Survey on Youth Religious Attitudes*.
4. Motahhari, M. (1978). *Causes of Materialistic Tendencies*. Qom: Sadra.
Footnotes:
– Footnote 1: For further reading on the “religious experience” theory, see:
– Javadi Amoli, A. (2006). *Shari’a in the Mirror of Knowledge*. Qom: Asra. (pp. 117-120)
– Footnote 2: Similar statistics in:
– Islamic Research Center of the Parliament. (2020). *Measuring Religiosity in Iran*. (p. 34)
Citation Style in Text:
(Hosseinzadeh, 2016: 45)
This article provides a scientific framework for analyzing religious doubt in Iran, eliminating narrative elements to focus on empirical data and theoretical analysis.
